Legal Opinion
Blue Ridge Sewer Improvement District v. Lowry & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 27, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8348PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
This case involves the doctrine of unjust enrichment. As explained more fully herein, we hold that one who provides services under a contract with a political subdivision may not recover for the value of those services under quantum meruit if the contract was entered into in violation of a state law requiring approval of a majority of property owners in the area affected.
I. FACTS
Blue Ridge Sewer Improvement District (Blue Ridge) is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona formed pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 11-701 to -771.45. 1 The District is divided into a number of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Ingleside v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Sierra Vista v. Cochise Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Plastics & Equipment Sales Co. v. DeSoto, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Town of Holbrook v. GirandArizona Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davies v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Fund Manager v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Levine v. Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & Mcanally, P. L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.