Legal Opinion

Davis v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In this state, proceedings for the ap-

pointment of an administrator are statutory, and decisions from other jurisdictions are not of great assistance in the determination of a question such as the one before us.

In the case at bar, no person within a preferred class has applied for appointment. The petition of Finley & Son, Inc., an alleged creditor, does not place Smith in that class.

“Statutes regulating the order in which administration may be granted are mandatory and leave the courts no discretion in the matter, save where there are two or more persons equally entitled under the statute,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Briedwell v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Matlock v. MatlockOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re Estate of OttOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Vaught v. StrubleIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. In re Woodhouse's EstateDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API