Briedwell v. Henderson
Oregon Supreme Court
From Yamhill: Harry H. Belt, Judge. Department 2. From the record we learn that this is an action of claim and delivery, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of a Ford motor vehicle. It appears that one A. J. Syron was the owner of the vehicle in question; that on November 25, 1918, he made application to register the car for the year 1919 and a license covering that year was issued to him by the Secretary of State.
Read the full summary
From Yamhill: Harry H. Belt, Judge. Department 2. From the record we learn that this is an action of claim and delivery, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of a Ford motor vehicle. It appears that one A. J. Syron was the owner of the vehicle in question; that on November 25, 1918, he made application to register the car for the year 1919 and a license covering that year was issued to him by the Secretary of State. Later the car was mortgaged to the Bank of Linnton to secure a certain promissory note. It is asserted that Syron went into bankruptcy. An order was made by the…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The trial court entered a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs because of the provision of Section 9, Chapter 399, Laws of Oregon, 1919, which provides that:
“Upon the purchase of a motor vehicle registered in accordance with this act, the title of the number plates shall vest in the vendee, and said vendee shall within five days after the date of purchase notify the Secretary of State, stating his name and business address, the name of the vendor, the license or registration number and the engine number under which such motor vehicle is registered, upon the receipt…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Camas Stage Co. v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Portland v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Roy L. Houck & Sons v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.