Legal Opinion

U. Fig Date v. Carroll, Brough, Robinson Humphrey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1926No. 13876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This action was for breach of warranty and damages growing out of a buying and selling contract for 165 sacks of English walnuts, weighing 16,985 pounds, bought by defendant in error from plaintiff in error according to sample, at 21% cents per pound. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff alleged in its petition that defendant was a nonresident of the state; that it ordered the nuts by letter, and attached a copy of the letter; that the nuts were worth 21% cents per pound, but the nuts shipped with bill of lading attached were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scanlan v. BarkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Stepp v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Cardwell-Lyman Sales Co. v. LiebmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Rumley v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burden v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Spring v. MajorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Holloway v. O'DellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API