Legal Opinion

Holloway v. O'Dell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1928No. 19192PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was begun in the trial court by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below. An attachment was issued and levied on the real estate belonging to the defendants and service was had by publication. The attachment was sustained, judgment rendered, real estate sold, and writ of assistance issued. Thereafter the defendant in error filed his motion in the action to vacate and set aside the attachment, the judgment procured in the cause, the sheriffs sale made therein, the writ of assistance, and all other orders and judgments entered in said cause, on -the grounds of lack of jurisdiction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson Et Vir v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Brigham v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Davis v. De GeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Stonebraker-Zea Cattle Co. v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Scott v. Woods Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BoyceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Chase v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Bell v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Pomeroy v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Pitman v. Fidelity Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API