Legal Opinion

Cardwell-Lyman Sales Co. v. Liebman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1925No. 14483PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, 0.

This proceeding in error is supported by a brief which fails to point out the specific errors complained of, and it is only by reading the entire brief that this court has been able to determine the grounds on which reversal of 'the judgment is sought The argument in the brief is general and covers the entire case, but nowhere directs this court’s attention to any particular assignment ot error. On pages 9, 10, and 11 of plaintiff’s brief instructions 4 and 5 of the court’s general charge to the jury are copied in full, and it is stated that plaintiff: in error excepted…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. U. Fig Date v. Carroll, Brough, Robinson HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hartley Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Mullendore v. Stillwater Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Stryker v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API