Cardwell-Lyman Sales Co. v. Liebman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, 0.
This proceeding in error is supported by a brief which fails to point out the specific errors complained of, and it is only by reading the entire brief that this court has been able to determine the grounds on which reversal of 'the judgment is sought The argument in the brief is general and covers the entire case, but nowhere directs this court’s attention to any particular assignment ot error. On pages 9, 10, and 11 of plaintiff’s brief instructions 4 and 5 of the court’s general charge to the jury are copied in full, and it is stated that plaintiff: in error excepted…
2Cited by4 opinions
- U. Fig Date v. Carroll, Brough, Robinson HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hartley Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Mullendore v. Stillwater Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Stryker v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933