Legal Opinion

Rumley v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 1917No. 7728PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by G. W. Sanders and another against J. H. Rumley and others. Judgment for plaintiffs against J. H. Rumley, and he brings error, and after dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution, defendants in error move for judgment ágainst sureties on the supersedeas bond.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JOHNSON, C.

An order was entered in this court upon September 5, 1916, dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution. A supersedeas bond had been given and approved, staying execution of the judgment of the lower court. A motion has been died herein for judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond.

By virtue of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, p. 606, as construed by this court in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, Wilcox v. Wootton, 60 Okla. 204, 159 Pac. 1118, and kindred cases, the motion must be sustained,

Upon March 27, 1915, judgment was entered in tiie lower court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Wilcox v. WoottonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. U. Fig Date v. Carroll, Brough, Robinson HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API