Legal Opinion

August Guyer, Pascal Matile, Ernst Peterhans and Werner Zollinger v. Charles Robert Cramer, Hans-Peter Meyer and Walter Feist

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of the subject matter of the single count of Interference No. 90,053 to the senior party Charles Robert Cramer et al. 1

August Guyer et al. are involved in the interference on their application Serial No. 622,733, filed November 19, 1956, for “Process for the Pressure Synthesis of Urea,” claiming a convention priority date based on their Swiss application dated April 16, 1956.

Cramer et al. are involved in the interference on (1) their continuation-in-part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loy W. Sockman and Elliott W. Brady v. Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Robert N. Noyce v. Jack St. Clair Kilby, Jack St. Clair Kilby v. Robert N. NoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Ewald A. Kamp v. John J. HoughtalingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Ewald A. Kamp v. John J. HoughtalingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API