Ewald A. Kamp v. John J. Houghtaling

In Guyer v. Cramer, 318 F.2d 757, 50 CCPA 1386, this court stated, with respect to the question of support for interference counts, that “the minimum legal requirement is that support for count limitations be clear.” I think it far from clear that the Kamp reissue application supports the three limitations emphasized in the count as reproduced in the majority opinion.

The application does not disclose that the nut and bolt assemblies of the attaching means are tightened to provide fixed spaces between the washers before the wires of the coil spring construction are brought into their final…