Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 6, 1994No. 12564PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether an undeveloped lot, which was created prior to the adoption of zoning regulations and which complied with those regulations when adopted, is protected from later regulations that render it nonconforming. We answer in the negative and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff owns a plot of land fifty feet by approximately 107 feet located in a development on Wells Place in Stratford, and referred to as lot 19. Lot 19 was created when real property owned by Flora Deck- and was subdivided in 1918. A map of the resulting fifty-two lots was accepted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. Sherman-Colonial Realty Corp. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Kulak v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Archambault v. WadlowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Miller v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Poirier v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Burns v. Stamford Zba, No. Cv 01 0182512 (Dec. 20, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  5. City of West Haven v. Gamelin, No. Cvnh 9708-8389 (Aug. 17, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API