Archambault v. Wadlow
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant Waterford zoning board of appeals (board)1 denied the plaintiff landowners’ application for a variance from the setback requirements of the Waterford zoning regulations. The trial court sustained the plaintiffs’ appeal and, upon certification from this court, the board appealed.
The salient facts are as follows. The plaintiffs, Leo J. and Mary J. Arehambault, purchased the subject parcel of land by deed in 1968. At the same time, the plaintiffs also purchased a thirty-two acre parcel contiguous to the subject lot. The subject lot, which was created as a distinct parcel in 1929,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pike v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Solomon v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Johnson v. Board of Zoning AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Miller v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Sakson Nursery, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.