Legal Opinion
Sherman-Colonial Realty Corp. v. Goldsmith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 31, 1967PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The factual situation presented on this appeal is more complex than usual in that it involves not only the judgment from which the appeal has been taken but the litigation in an independent but related action in which the Ridgefield planning commission, consisting of all the defendants in the present case, was the plaintiff. To lessen some inevitable confusion, the defendants in the present appeal will be referred to in this opinion, in all instances, as the commission.
The finding, which is not subject to correction in any material respect, discloses that the plaintiffs are the owner and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Country Lands, Inc. v. SwinnertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Stiebitz v. MahoneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Paul Natale Wendy Natale Jarrod Natale v. Town of Ridgefield Ridgefield Planning and Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Natale v. Town of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Connecticut Printers, Inc. v. Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.