Legal Opinion

Kulak v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 23, 1981PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, C. J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the defendant zoning board of appeals acted illegally or arbitrarily when it granted the individual defendants, Samuel and Helen Manka, a variance to build a dwelling house on lot number 146 of the Hillandale Park Subdivision in the city of Stamford. The plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers of the city of Stamford owning property which abuts or is within 100 feet of the property in question. On the plaintiffs’ appeal, the trial court found error and ordered the *480board’s action set aside. Upon a grant of certification, the individual defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Schultz v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Abel v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Osborne v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Board of Zoning AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Mandanici v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API