Legal Opinion

Traders & General Insurance v. Bailey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1936No. 6625PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Plaintiff in error, Traders & General Insurance Company, will be designated herein as defendant. Defendant in error, W. M. Bailey, will be designated as plaintiff. On September 14, 1931, while in the course of his employment as an employee of Independent Crushed Stone Company, plaintiff was injured. Defendant carried Workmen’s Compensation insurance for the employer. Shortly after the injury, and without any order of the Industrial Accident Board, defendant began paying plaintiff compensation at the rate of $7.00…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. FodgeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brannon v. Pacific Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Pickett v. Texas Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API