Legal Opinion
Stupak-Thrall v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 25, 1994No. 2:93-cv-00065PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are owners of recreational and resort property on the northern shore of Crooked Lake in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Most of Crooked Lake is within the Sylvania Wilderness, which is administered by the Department of Agriculture Forest Service (the Forest Service). Plaintiffs’ actions seek review of a decision by the Forest Service to regulate various activities on Crooked Lake promulgated in Amendment No. 1 to its Land Resource Management Plan. They also claim that the restrictions in Amendment No. 1 constitute an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Stupak-Thrall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SchmittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Stupak-Thrall v. GlickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.