Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel Glickman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants, seeking a declaration that Crooked Lake is not part of the Sylvania Wilderness area and therefore is not within the regulatory authority of the United States Forest Service, appeal the district court’s decision dismissing as time-barred their claim against the United States. Because we find that the plaintiffs’ claims are untimely and that the government did not waive its right to raise a statute of limitations defense, we will AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment.
I
The plaintiffs are property owners holding certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Herr v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Rogers v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- DeSuze v. AmmonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Izaak Walton League of America, Inc. v. KimbellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Griffin v. ReznickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.