Legal Opinion

Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel Glickman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 3, 2003No. 99-1666PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, seeking a declaration that Crooked Lake is not part of the Sylvania Wilderness area and therefore is not within the regulatory authority of the United States Forest Service, appeal the district court’s decision dismissing as time-barred their claim against the United States. Because we find that the plaintiffs’ claims are untimely and that the government did not waive its right to raise a statute of limitations defense, we will AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

I

The plaintiffs are property owners holding certain…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Herr v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Rogers v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. DeSuze v. AmmonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. Izaak Walton League of America, Inc. v. KimbellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Griffin v. ReznickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API