Legal Opinion

Stupak-Thrall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1995No. 94-1863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The extent and validity of federal power under the Wilderness Act of 1964 and the Michigan Wilderness Act of 1987 form the central issues of this appeal. Plaintiffs are possessors of surface rights to a lake, held in common with the United States. They challenge certain United States Forest Service restrictions on activities on the lake, claiming that they are beyond the Forest Service’s statutory and constitutional authority. The district court upheld the restrictions, finding them to be within the power granted by the Property Clause of Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. City Management Corp. v. U.S. Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Borlem S.A.—Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. City of Lake AngelusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. GabrionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. David Herr v. United States Forest Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API