Legal Opinion

Fromer v. Freedom of Information Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 8, 1994No. 12763PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant freedom of information commission. General Statutes §§ l-21i (d) and 4-183.1

*156The plaintiff claims that the trial court (1) improperly determined that a court monitor’s tape recording of a trial is not subject to the public disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act and (2) improperly determined that the denial of access to such a tape recording is a constitutional violation of the first amendment to the United States constitution.

The plaintiff also claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Globe Newspaper Company v. Daniel F. Pokaski, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Fromer v. Boyer-Napert PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Bank of Boston Connecticut v. BrewsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. State v. WraggConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API