Legal Opinion

Nevarre v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

David Nevarre (Nevarre) appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed a referee’s decision denying Nevarre’s requested training allowances for a physician’s assistant program costing approximately $36,000.

This case involves the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487, as amended (Trade Act), which established a federal program providing trade readjustment allowances (TRA) and trade adjustment assistance (TAA) training benefits to workers in certain *363industries who are certified by the United States Secretary of Labor (Secretary)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Marshall v. Commissioner of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Wilson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation Benefits & Allowances v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Creps v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hyde v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API