Legal Opinion

Ford v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1980No. Appeal, No. 372 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

William Ford has appealed from an order of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) disallowing his appeal from, and thereby leaving intact, a referee’s decision that Ford was ineligible for trade readjustment assistance (TRA) under the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §2101 et seq. (Act). We affirm.

Ford was employed by Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation as a fork lift operator apprentice. The last day he actually performed services for his employer was March 24, 1977. After this date, he was on paid vacation leave for twelve weeks and thereafter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bushofsky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Lowe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Felcyn v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Deemer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Figas v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API