Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 1993No. C4-92-1657PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant challenges the decision of the Commissioner of Jobs and Training denying him federal training adjustment assistance. We affirm.
FACTS
Dirk Marshall lost his job as a senior financial analyst with the E.F. Johnson Company in May 1990. In December 1990 the director of the United States Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance declared that Marshall and other E.F. Johnson employees had lost their jobs due to foreign competition, making them eligible for federal training adjustment assistance pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2296 (1988).
In January 1991, Marshall applied to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Markel v. City of Circle PinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Wise v. Denesen Insulation Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Wilson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Nevarre v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Wilder v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Wilder v. Employment Security Commission of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- White v. State, Board of ReviewLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997