Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.

Gary W. Hyde (Claimant) petitions, pro se, for review of the November 9, 2011, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) affirming the referee’s determination that Claimant did not qualify for a program transfer in accordance with the Trade Act of 1974 (Trade Act), as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487, and its attendant regulations.1 We affirm.

*216Claimant was enrolled in a nursing program at the University of Pittsburgh. The program was approved under the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program. Claimant was failing the nursing program and,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nevarre v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API