Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Hoblit

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1926No. 1260PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This is a replevin action. The property is machinery and implements used in plowing. The plaintiff’s interest was under a chattel mortgage to him as mortgagee from the defendants as mortgagors. The debt secured by the mortgage was $.1500, evidenced by two notes for $750 each, one due December 1,1923, and the other due December 1,1924. The plaintiff’s right to possession of the property, if he had that right, was for the purpose of foreclosing the mortgage-. The petition and affidavit for re-plevin were filed, and the summons and writ of replevin (order for delivery) issued,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McGinnis v. BeattyWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hunt v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Thompson v. ScheidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Schlessinger v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hamburger v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Barrett v. Oakley, SheriffWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ex Parte Gre Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API