Legal Opinion
Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1989No. 88-177PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
This appeal involves a dispute over the applicability of an arbitration provision in a lease to a dispute regarding the timeliness of notice given under a rental adjustment clause. 1 We hold that the trial court erred in concluding that the disputed issue was not arbitrable. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment on the merits and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 2
Hope Carter and John Hemphill, Jr. (the “Landlords”) are parties to a 99-year ground lease for land located at 4101 Cathedral Avenue N.W. in the District with the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Benefits Communication Corp. v. KlieforthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Meshel v. Ohev Sholom Talmud TorahDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Haynes v. KuderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Grad v. Wetherholt GalleriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Washington Automotive Co. v. 1828 L Street AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.