Legal Opinion

Honey Baked Hams, Inc. v. Dickens

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1995No. C018102PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

After plaintiff Honey Baked Hams, Inc. (HBH), voluntarily dismissed its action for unlawful detainer against defendant E. Robert Dickens, the trial court awarded the defendant his attorney fees pursuant to the express terms of the commercial lease between the parties. HBH appeals from the order, claiming the defendant may not recover attorney fees because HBH voluntarily dismissed the action. HBH further contends the fees awarded were excessive. We shall affirm.

There are few facts necessary for an understanding of this dispute. In March 1993, the defendant signed a commercial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Genis v. KrasneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Akins v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API