Legal Opinion

Olson v. Siordia

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1964PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

These appeals present issues on whether there is credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that Olson was causally negligent; whether the trial court committed error in that it failed to clarify the jury’s apparent confusion as to the distinction between negligence and cause; and whether the damages awarded to Luisa Rodriguez and Frances Arias by the jury were excessive.

*278 Credible Evidence to Support the Finding of Negligence.

Defendant Olson and his insurers concede that if the jury could have believed the testimony of Mr. Siordia it could have found Olson causally negligent. They…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kincannon v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bethke v. DuweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Butzow v. Wausau Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Moritz v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API