Legal Opinion

Fehrman v. Smirl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Some of the appellant's arguments on this appeal are directed at claimed errors in our previous opinion in this case. Fehrman v. Smirl (1963), 20 Wis. (2d) 1, 121 N. W. (2d) 255, 122 N. W. (2d) 439. We recently had occasion to reiterate the rule that on a second appeal the supreme court will not reconsider its rulings made on the earlier appeal. .In Cathey v. Industrial Comm. (1964), ante, pp. 184, 186, 130 N. W. (2d) 777, this court stated:

“We will not re-examine the merits of those contentions of the appellant which were involved in the previous appeal.”

In the opinion rendered on the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Robinson v. CrotwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Magdalene M. Smoot and Ryan M. Smoot v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. And Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Curl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API