Legal Opinion
Interinsurance Exchange v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1983No. Civ. 26594PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
Sixteen-year-old Laura Smith (Laura) was involved in an accident while driving her father’s (Smith) Datsun pickup truck. As a result of the accident, Kathy and Richard Field, occupants of the other car, sued Laura, her father and her mother, Mary Eva Klinger (Klinger) for damages.
Klinger’s automobile liability insurance carrier, Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California (Interinsurance) sought declaratory relief contending Klinger’s policy did not provide coverage for Laura because the pickup truck was a “nonowned” automobile available for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MarrDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Drollinger v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Medina v. GEICO Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Checkerboard PizzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Malouf v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.