Legal Opinion

Malouf v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 7, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to construe provisions in two automobile liability insurance policies which exclude from coverage any accident involving an automobile other than the “covered auto” which is “furnished or available for [the insured’s] regular use.”

Peter G. Malouf (Malouf) owned four automobiles for his personal use and that of his family. Two of these automobiles were insured under a policy issued by the Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), as a servicing carrier for the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Butler v. Bonner & Barnewall, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. CookKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Price Ex Rel. MoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Waggoner v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fiscor v. Atlantic County BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. EDWARD SIEMIETKOSKI VS. CHARLIE VELASQUEZ-FLORES (L-1481-17, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  3. RICHARD G. BREBNER VS. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (L-1550-18, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API