Legal Opinion
Batkowski v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 48 C.D. 1984, 49 C.D. 1984, and 50 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Petitioners in these consolidated appeals are token unemployment compensation claimants who represent the members of the United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO Local 787 (Union). In its decision below, the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1 concluding that Petitioners’ unemployment was due to a strike, rather than a lock-out by Avco Lycoming Division of Avco Corporation (Employer).2
The relevant facts, as found by the referee and adopted by the Board,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- High v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Borello v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Avco Corp. v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Jehn v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Avco Corp. v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987