Legal Opinion

Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board v. Oudin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 2002No. 01-782PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

Appellant Arkan- sas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board challenges the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s reversal of its decision to sanction Appellees Marc Oudin, Jr., and Bail Bond Financing, Inc., for the dual ownership of a bail bond company and a fine-collection company that serve a common court. The Board concluded that Mr. Oudin’s dual ownership of the companies violated Section 17 B of Rule and Regulation 1 of the Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board. We hold that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Fayetteville v. EdmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Arkansas State Police Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Green v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. BD. OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. State v. OldnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation Commission v. City of BentonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of BentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Carroll v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API