Legal Opinion

State v. Oldner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 2005No. 04-995PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

The instant appeal presents the issue of what constitutes an “infamous crime” for purposes of removing an elected official from public office. Appellant, the State of Arkansas, through the prosecuting attorney for the Tenth Judicial District, argues that an infamous crime is one involving dishonesty or deceit and is not limited to those crimes punishable by more than one year’s imprisonment. This is an issue not previously addressed by this court. Because this appeal presents an issue of first impression, as well as an issue involving the interpretation of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Baldwin v. RichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Navarro v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Snyder v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. CassellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Kelli Jo Griffin v. Paul Pate, in His Official Capacities as the Secretary of State of Iowa, and Denise Fraise, in Her Official Capacities as the County Auditor of Lee County, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Edwards v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API