Legal Opinion

Quackenbush v. Mission Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1996No. B094721PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

Pursuant to the Insurance Code, Insurance Commissioner Charles Quackenbush (Commissioner) assumed responsibility for managing the insolvency of Mission Insurance Company (Mission), a defunct insurer. Mission both bought and sold reinsurance, in which the reinsured contracted with other insurance companies to exchange some of its policyholders’ premiums for indemnity against covered losses incurred by its insureds. The relevant policies provided property and casualty liability coverage if specified events occurred, as opposed to life or disability coverage. Many of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Quackenbush v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. SUTCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Modesto High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People Ex Rel. Fund American Companies v. California InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re the Liquidation of Integrity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Concord Communities v. City of ConcordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API