Legal Opinion

State v. Hull

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 1978No. Cr 1491, CA 7788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction by jury verdict of two counts of murder. There are five assignments of error. (1) Defendant argues the court erred when it allowed the prosecution to cross-examine a psychologist as to her knowledge of what defendant did on the day before and the day of the murders. (2) The failure to grant defendant’s motion for mistrial on this basis is also assigned as error. (3) Defendant further objects to the admission of certain out of court statements as hearsay, (4) a jury instruction defining extreme emotional disturbance, and (5) the admission of several photographs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Samuel v. VanderheidenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. AkridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. State v. OttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API