Zumbrun v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that I explain below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
CASE BACKGROUND
The Zumbruns, plaintiffs herein, own a home in Carmichael, California, which sits atop a cliff overlooking the American River. Defendant United States Automobile Association (“USAA”) executed and delivered to plaintiffs a standard flood insurance policy pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4001, et seq., insuring the house. 1 In the Winter and Spring of 1986,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Alta California Regional Center v. Fremont Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.