Legal Opinion

Zumbrun v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 3, 1989No. CIV. S-88-307 LKKPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that I explain below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

CASE BACKGROUND

The Zumbruns, plaintiffs herein, own a home in Carmichael, California, which sits atop a cliff overlooking the American River. Defendant United States Automobile Association (“USAA”) executed and delivered to plaintiffs a standard flood insurance policy pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4001, et seq., insuring the house. 1 In the Winter and Spring of 1986,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
  3. Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. Alta California Regional Center v. Fremont Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API