Legal Opinion

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1925No. 24,902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The defendants A. J. Cook and Anna J. Cook are husband and wife. The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the former. The action is to set aside as fraudulent as to the plaintiff a conveyance to Mrs. Cook of 112 acres of land, standing of record in the name of one Doll, who had given a deed to Cook, which was unrecorded and was returned at the time to'Doll for cancelation. The findings were against the plaintiff and it appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

On April 6, 1920, Doll contracted with Cook to convey him 529 acres of land in Traverse county for a consideration of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Matheson v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Albright v. AlbrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Crossman v. KeisterIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Baldwin v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Exsted v. ExstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Roberts v. FriedellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Cohen v. HirschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Gaines v. Van DemarkMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. R. F. Gehrke Sheet Metal Works v. MahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API