Legal Opinion

Flomar Corp. v. Logue

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1965No. Appeal, No. 214PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

One Martin Greitzer, as attorney for both plaintiff, Flomar Corporation, and defendants, Sadie Logue (appellant) and Myra E. Miles, caused judgment to be entered against defendants and in favor of plaintiff, purportedly by virtue of a warrant of attorney contained in a four-year, written lease, signed by defendants, as lessees for premises located at 3156 Kensington Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A praecipe for appearance and confession, assessing damages, and an averment of default having been filed, the prothonotary entered judgment as assessed. Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frantz Tractor Co. v. Wyoming Valley NurserySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. L. B. Foster Co. v. Tri-W Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Tower Development & Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Wilson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Roche v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Blumer v. DorfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. B.C.Y., Inc., Equipment Leasing Associates v. BukovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Richer Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Colony Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Beaver Valley Engineering Supplies Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API