Legal Opinion

H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Richer Communications, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1973No. Appeal, No. 925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to strike or open a confessed judgment.

Appellant agreed to lease from appellee two billboards for a period of two years, each billboard to be painted twice during the term of the lease, the rental to be $200 per month for one billboard and $275 per month for the other. The contract of lease, which was appellee’s standard printed form contract, provided that in the event of default in payment, all unpaid rentals for the remainder of the term would become immediately due and payable, and judgment could be confessed in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fox v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Funds for Business Growth, Inc. v. MaraldoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Grady v. SchifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Grakelow v. KidderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Tower Development & Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ferrick v. BianchiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Haggerty v. FetnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. J. F. Realty Co. v. YerkesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Fertico Belgium S. A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Frank Nero Auto Lease, Inc. v. TownsendOhio Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API