Legal Opinion

Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Tower Development & Investment Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1961No. Appeal, No. 169PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

The question involved is very narrow. Where a judgment is confessed on a note in a large amount which is authorized by the judgment, but includes on its face an item which is wholly unauthorized by the *389warrant of attorney, is the judgment valid as to the amount properly confessed, or is the entire judgment void and should be stricken off?

Defendant petitioned to open and likewise petitioned to strike off a judgment entered by confession in the amount of $232,270.94, by virtue of a warrant of attorney contained in a mortgage note. There was included in the confessed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grady v. SchifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Solazo v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Polis v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Boggs v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Baldwin v. American Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Germantown Savings Bank v. TalackiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. B.C.Y., Inc., Equipment Leasing Associates v. BukovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Roche v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Kline v. Marianne Germantown Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API