Legal Opinion

State v. Beall

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 2009No. A09-0501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

In this pretrial appeal, the state challenges the district court’s (1) conclusion that the stop of respondent’s vehicle for an inoperable center brake light was not justified by reasonable articulable suspicion of a violation of law; (2) suppression of evidence; and (3) dismissal of gross-misdemeanor driving-while-impaired (DWI) charges against respondent. Because the record establishes that objective, reasonable, articulable suspicion of a violation of law existed at the time of the stop, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Coon Rapids Police Officer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EdstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Neil Douglas Rollins v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API