Palmer Etc. v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING to review an order of the Railroad Commission dismissing a complaint presented to it. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a proceeding under section 67 of the Public Utilities Act (Stats. 1911 (Ex. Sess.) p. 55) to review an order of the railroad commission dismissing a complaint which the petitioners filed and presented to the commission.
In their complaint to the commission the plaintiffs alleged that said water company was engaged in the business of distributing and selling water for public use for irrigation, domestic and other purposes in San Diego County, that it has…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.