Legal Opinion

Duluth & Iron Range Railroad v. St. Louis County

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1900No. 173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

EBBOE TO THE SUPBEME COUET OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court..

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The lands granted to the plaintiff in error to aid in the construction of its line of railroad were swamp lands which had accrued to the State under the act of Congress of March 12, 1860. The granting act did not impose a gross receipt tax or purport to make any contract with reference to a tax of that character, but provided, in section 2, in express terms, that the lands granted should be exempt. The proviso in question reads as follows: “ None of the lands hereby granted shall be subject to taxation until the expiration of five years from the issuance of the patent by the State, unless…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Morrison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API