Legal Opinion
Vergara v. Bentsen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 15, 1994No. 91 Civ. 1247 (SWK), 91 Civ. 6480 (SWK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
■ In this action for employment discrimination based on sex, defendant Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury (the “Government”) moves, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for partial summary judgment. On June 18, 1993, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leonard Bernikow for a Report and Recommendation. Subsequently, on March 17, 1994, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) granting in part and denying in part the Government’s motion. Presently before the Court are the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vivian J. Smart v. Ball State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Dortz v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Burrell v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Castro v. Local 1199, National Health & Human Services Employees UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.