Legal Opinion

Burrell v. City University of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 17, 1995No. 94 Civ. 8711 (RWS)PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

In this sexual discrimination action, defendants City University of New York (“CUNY”) and Dr. Stanford A. Roman, Jr., M.D. (“Roman”) (collectively, CUNY and Roman are the “Defendants”) move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for an order granting summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion will be denied in part and granted in part.

The Parties

Plaintiff Cherie Burrell (“Burrell”) is a resident of Laurelton, New York.

Defendant CUNY is a public higher education system comprised of several senior and community colleges throughout New York City and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Primavera Familienstifung v. AskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. Nweke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Adeniji v. Administration for Children ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API