Legal Opinion
Fertilizer Corp. of India v. IDI Management, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 11, 1982No. C-1-79-570PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT IDI’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This matter came on for consideration of respondent’s motion to reconsider, 517 F.Supp. 948 (doc. 46), petitioners’ memo in opposition (doc. 49), and respondent IDEs reply (doc. 50). Respondent IDI Management, Inc.’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Decision (doc. 38) is based on newly discovered evidence. That portion of the Memorandum Opinion and Decision which respondent is asking the Court to reconsider concerns IDEs third affirmative defense “public policy — arbitrator…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fertilizer Corp. of India v. IDI Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Eugene Baynum v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atsa of California, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Claimant/appellant v. Continental Insurance Co., Etc. v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appellee. Hamed Abulhassan, Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Atsa of California, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Claimant/appellant v. Continental Insurance Co., Etc. v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appellee. Hamed Abulhassan, Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appellee. Atsa of California, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Cairo General Contracting Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Wilson v. Upjohn Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Atsa of California, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Atsa of California, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985