Legal Opinion
Atsa of California, Inc. v. Continental Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1985No. Nos. 81-6017, 81-6026 and 84-7565PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On the basis of information supplied to the panel and the decision in Fertilizer Corporation of India v. IDI Management, Inc., 530 F.Supp. 542 (S.D.Ohio 1982), we assumed in our previous decision in this case that the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) would not provide a neutral arbitrator to serve with the parties’ partisan arbitrators. ATSA of California, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Co., 702 F.2d 172, 175-76 (9th Cir.1983). Consequently, we concluded that the parties’ contractual agreement as to arbitration could not be fully executed. We ordered that, if the parties’ partisan…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Beverly Hills Bancorp, a California Corporation, Debtor. Commercial Paper Holders v. R.W. Hine, as Trustee of Beverly Hills BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Atsa of California, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Claimant/appellant v. Continental Insurance Co., Etc. v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appellee. Hamed Abulhassan, Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- General Atomic Co. v. FelterSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fertilizer Corp. of India v. IDI Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982