Legal Opinion
Atsa of California, Inc. v. Continental Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1983No. Nos. 81-6017, 81-6026PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
ATSA of California, Inc. (“ATSA”), and Hamed Abulhassan, an officer of ATSA, appeal the district court’s order staying all proceedings and directing all parties to submit to arbitration in accordance with the written contract between ATSA and Cairo General Contracting Co. (“Cairo”).1 The stay order is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) in accordance *174with the Enelow-Ettelson rule.2 Wren v. Sletten Construction Co., 654 F.2d 529, 532-33 (9th Cir.1981).
BACKGROUND
In April 1978, ATSA, a California corporation, and Cairo, an Egyptian corporation, entered into a written…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atsa of California, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Claimant/appellant v. Continental Insurance Co., Etc. v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appellee. Hamed Abulhassan, Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Cairo General Contracting Co., Cross-Defendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983