Hairston v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
Tbe defendant assigns as error tbe following excerpt from tbe trial judge’s charge to tbe jury: “Nominal damages, gentlemen, are construed to be, say $1.00, $10.00, $15.00, $50.00 — some nominal damages, and if you reach this issue and you find be is not damaged more than what is a nominal sum of money, you are to answer this, then, in a nominal sum of money unless you find that tbe sum of $55.00 paid to him and bis lawyer and bis doctor is a full, just and complete settlement already. . . . Tbe defendant says, therefore, on this issue you ought not to allow any amount of • nominal damages,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Sawyer v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Snow v. . DebuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Liverman v. . ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Lola Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Sebastian v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hunt v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Ballenger Paving Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.