Sebastian v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
The plaintiff in the trial court appeals the dismissal of two counts of a seven count complaint against the District of Columbia (“District”), setting forth claims stemming from a sexual assault committed upon her by an ambulance attendant employed by the District. She urges this court to hold the District vicariously liable for intentional torts by an employee, for acts committed outside the scope of employment, under a theory of “breach of non-delegable duty of protective care.” We decline to do so and accordingly affirm.
I
On June 2, 1988, appellant, seriously injured…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Lacy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Phelan v. City of Mount RainierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sean T. Haddon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Atkins v. Industrial Telecommunications Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.