Legal Opinion

Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NC

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 28, 1984No. 415PA83PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Medical Mutual maintains that it is not liable for either the punitive damages or the actual damages awarded to plaintiff, and that the trial court committed reversible error in finding it liable. With regard to both the punitive and actual damages, the insurance company proffers similar arguments in support of its contention of non-liability. Defendant first argues that North Carolina’s public policy precludes insurance coverage of punitive and compensatory damages caused by intentional misconduct. Second, the terms of the insurance contract did not include coverage for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Michael E. Wallace, David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti v. Daljit S. Buttar and Paramjit Buttar, Robert Winston, AdditionalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API